When Uttarakhand was carved out of Uttar Pradesh, people hoped it would emerge as a distinct hill state, preserving its unique culture and traditions. Himachal Pradesh was seen as a model of balanced development rooted in its geography and heritage. However, in the race for modernisation, Uttarakhand’s growth is increasingly mirroring that of the plains—raising concerns that the very essence of a hill state is fading away.
Statehood activists believe that the struggle for Uttarakhand’s creation was not merely for administrative separation, but for safeguarding local culture, traditions, and resources. Vijay Bhatt, chairman of Apni Dharohar Nyas, said that the movement aimed to strengthen the state’s cultural and spiritual identity. “We are moving away from our roots in the pursuit of modernity. Our cultural symbols, wooden craftsmanship, and traditional instruments still await proper preservation,” he said.
Activist Pradeep Kukreti noted that the state was formed to protect its language, traditions, and heritage, which were being neglected under Uttar Pradesh’s administration. “Development has happened, but not in balance with our hilly needs. Yet, it is encouraging that individuals are now coming forward to preserve local culture,” he added.
Surendra Kumar, convener of the Joint Struggle Committee’s Central Factual Committee, said that the state still lacks a clear direction for sustainable growth. “Our resources define who we are, but their unplanned exploitation is putting our heritage at risk. It’s time for everyone to unite and give Uttarakhand its true identity,” he said.
Veteran activist Chandrakala Bisht recalled her struggle during the Muzaffarnagar protest and expressed disappointment over the current state of affairs. “We dreamed that Uttarakhand’s development would reflect its natural and cultural wealth, but it has turned unplanned. By the golden jubilee of statehood, we must ensure that our sacrifices feel justified,” she said.
